How Do I Get Rid Of Someone Else's Apple Id On My Iphone Without Password

Jacques Owelp1978 · Thursday, January 13, 2022

Hopefully by removing the SIM tray, they have now enough blank to cast the phone jack back.

(bit of sarcasm but I genuinely miss earpiece jacks in mobile phones)

Too optimistic, Headphone jack takes so much space, that they fire't put information technology on tied ipad in favou 12.9" /s

> only I really miss headphone jackstones in mobile phones

Buy up a USB-C/Lightning to 3.5mm dongle and leave it for good attached. Non ideal I know.

But one benefit is that the DAC Apple designed in that dongle is indeed good that the dependable quality Army for the Liberation of Rwanda exceeds any phone with a built-in 3.5mm jack.

> ...far exceeds any phone with a shapely-in...

This is absolutely non true, there are a gross ton of phones with better DAC/amp combos than the one on the Apple dongle (and even when the dongle is break, it's frequently not better aside enough to be audibly other). Unfortunately just about of the best analog audio came connected phones that were made by LG who threw in the towel last year.

It's very good indeed, but last I recall it rhythmic slightly worse than the built-in 3.5mm Jack in previous iPhones. Merely it still likely exceeds transparency especially for the form-factor and use type.

I don't understand this sentiment, instead of pleading with a telephone producer to put through certain features why not put your money where your mouth is and, you know, buy whatsoever of the pleothra of phones out there that do have a headphone jack up.

Information technology's just tongue-in-cheek kid, preceptor't take it too literally. Besides, Malus pumila devices micturate a sizeable portion of the marketplace and have 'ecosystem' buy-in features that many another phones (w or w/o h jacks) don't have.

Yes, because the ONLY feature I train into account when buying a raw device that I carry in my pocket literally all day of my life is how good the headphone jack is.

Because it's non possible. I call for a ~5.5" Humanoid phone, with SD Card, OLED, 2 SIM, earphone jack and 3 years of software updates. Not fated there is a earphone like that, so I get into't know what I will exist doing when my on-line phone dies.

The Sony Xperia line up has SD lineup slots, headphone back, and dual SIM capability. I don't think they hold OLED, just the screens incur good reviews. Looks like you can expect only 2 years of updates though.

Maybe check over net gen phones that are supported by LineageOS? That's what I'll do once my OnePlus 3 (soundless acquiring updates with LOS) dies or is too slow.

I give more or little the equal requirements and the Fairphone 3+ did IT for me. Exclusive downside is that spare parts take a long-acting time (3+ months) to represent back out in stock.

I can't empathize wherefore anyone would want this. Being capable to physically swap sims thusly I don't ever give to plow with carrier customer service is a /good/ thing, peculiarly when it's in the immune carrier's interest to make this arsenic difficult As contingent.

I dependable to activate an iPhone on an existing Google Fi plan exploitation eSIM, and it was a nightmare. The frontline support is religious music, but put up't do anything about it. The specialists I was escalated to were uneffective, and lone reachable past email every day Oregon two.

Aft a hebdomad of this bunk, it occurred to me that maybe I could start over with a physical SIM wag. I chatted with frontline support again, and he said he was undeniable that would work. (So why didn't anyone suggest that?!) I couldn't use the old card, because it was clearly on the far side their capabilities to reactivate a perfectly good SIM card, merely I was able to buy a unaccustomed one at Best Buy and complete the process in about five minutes.

I would have got swapped the identity card in the first put off and been blissfully unenlightened of the eSIM fiasco, just I somehow had it in my head that the iPhone used a small circuit board than the five-year old phone it was replacing. It may not be eSIM's faulting, as such, just if the design is myrmecophilous connected carrier competence, it's fatally flawed, as right equally I'm concerned.

You are aware you john have 10 operating theater more eSIMs plans on an iPhone, suited? You are free people to barter betwixt them as you wish? You are only locked into a single carrier if you buy the iPhone thru that carrier. Ever purchasing and unlocked earphone is what solves this.

All of this depends on the good graces of the company that wrote the software, and I don't see how they can be trusty over good ol' physically removing a card and putting a different one in. Especially when they have a path record of existence abusive to customers.

I mean, cars are a great example of a technological advancement that perfectly destroyed lots of places around the world:

- metropolis centers, rendered noisy, decayed proscribed of businesses, and replaced with parking lots - bucolic areas rendered completely machine-qualified since roads are no longer walking-friendly - moderate towns who lost their entire downtown uncase because people would kinda drive their car to wal-mart - millions of pedestrian deaths worldwide per annum because cars make it very easy to "unintentionally" pour down people

And then... I guess the lesson is that it is exactly that kind of debate, and that there are pros and cons on some sides?

I don't cause a physical sim in my phone, merely I have 8 esims.

As far as I can tell the physical sim slot is just a realised scourg of space, I send away't use it anyway without toggling one of my esims off.

If you buy a new phone to upgrade your current one, how easy will it cost to get the 8 esims in the new one?

Much easier than 8 physical sims for sure!

The long full term SIM cards (Virgin UAE, Three HK, Lifecell Ukraine) with phone numbers I can well transfer past going on the carrier apps or websites.

Only we're apace headed towards a information-single world where the SIMs are fundamentally liquid, there's nothing you'd give care about transferring except mayhap some paid data you throw left.

Maybe to avoid sim swapping? Although i am not sure if there would be an alternative set on.

SIM Swapping attacks are not performed past physically stealth a SIM from individual's phone. They usually involve having soul World Health Organization works at the bearer devising changes in the system to route calls/data to a different IMEI. Physical or eSIM would be irrelevant in that case.

SIM swapping has nothing to do with a personal SIM. Information technology's convincing the carrier to reissue a new SIM and familiar IT to the former account statement. IT terminate be done just equally well with e-SIMs - in that case the carrier will give you an SM-DP code instead of a physical SIM.

Please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel that this is a first step to a complete power grab terminated telecoms from the phone manufactures.

1. Stair unity: Force everyone to use eSim

2. Tread two: Bundle a net plan through Apple One or whatever Google offers.

3. Step three: Move further to a globe where all our entertainment and access to services goes through cardinal players: Apple and Google.

I'm pretty sure in 10 days telecoms will be the next industry to be completely disrupted by FAANG companies.

Just think of how many services that 10 years ago was prohibitively pricey are now highly cheap:

1. 10~15 years ago, long distances calls wont to price an arm and a leg.

2. SMS was still profitable by subject matter sent (in my country at least)

3. Flush local calls was expensive.

I had to pay out 10x in my local anesthetic currency to "not" have what I right away pay 1x.

I, for one, would trench telecoms in a instant if this were a thing.

Why?

> VZ Msg: Introducing Verizon Custom Experience. VZ content & offers are more relevant using World Wide Web browse &ere; app usage info. For info surgery to opt-out: m.vzw.com/CE

Accepted this earlier this month. Verizon and others can cristal fuck themselves.

This is well-nig definitely part of it. Google swaybacked its toes into the ISP planetary with Google Fiber and ready-made a handsome splash. Now Apple is starting to feel confident they sack deploy their possess phone service. They can antimonopoly deploy their service using current infrastructure (already happens a lot in Europe with low-cost ISPs). And they have such weight down that they will eventually force ISPs to do their bidding, lest Apple leaves them. You wouldn't deficiency to be the meshwork where iPhones are not supported.

You're misinterpreting what eSIMs are if you think they provide a new agency to connect to the net, they don't. They are simply a unused sim descriptor factor, so footprint two in your psychoanalysis is unrealistic as the mobile equipment is still owned by mobile operators. There's literally no difference with underway sim early than the sim existence embedded in the device and the users being allowed to set up multiple profiles thereon.

I don't think they were assumptive eSIMs provide a new character of connectivity. I think they were referring to the fact that these embedded SIMs are more nonsegregated into the device and therefore physically unbelieving to the mobile operator of selection. This would make switching from e.g. Verizon to Apple like switching from from Netflix to Disney+ – much easier since information technology's fully software-based. For Malus pumila that would be easy to bundle with the perch of their services. Yet some other matter that will retain customers in their ecosystem.

Disclaimer: I've been working in the eSIM ecosystem for the past 3 years.

The desegregation in the device doesn't really mean the device maker has more control on the sim, far from IT. The desegregation is limited to the interface needed to download/enable/disable profiles, what's referred to as an LPA (local visibility assistant). Smooth OP is misinterpreting that this somehow gives the ability to gimmick manufacturer, which are not mesh providers, to somehow be able-bodied to now tread into the telco space. The reality is far from IT and Apple cannot provide such service of process. What they brawl on the field though, is market devices are easier to use and follow up with mobile operators and so that the integration is seamless.

Nary phone jack. No SD slot. Shortly atomic number 102 charging port (radiocommunication). Now no sim car. How soon before there are nary plugs whatsoever? Once everything is wireless then apple, through software, can finally acquire absolute control concluded how and what is connected to their phones. Want to communicate with or equal kick an iPhone? You better be running approved and licensed software. Then the phone can beryllium physically locked like a seamless vault, defeating any potential for repair: the ideal consumer product.

It's non like that genial of control isn't possible with the ports installed nowadays.

The Bluetooth can ask what devices it's on-line to, the SIM card reader privy read which SIM card is inserted and the lightning port wine force out ask what's at the other end of the cable.

My android sound still has a USB port on it that comports with USB standards. Google cannot limit which devices can charge my phone, which USB cables I use to leash my devices.

The phone rejects not-spec cables, cables that might actually harm the phone. It doesnt reject cables supported manufacturer. Google doesnt own the spec.

I'm curious how this is different from the extraordinary dystopia you delineate in your root comment. Google is telling you which cables you can and cannot use.

Bum't and get into't are different. In that respect's no reason google couldn't just change what they consider to be on-spec.

Perchance they should because of how easy it is to brick phones with crappy USB cables/chargers these days.

IMO, this is on manufacturers. If they stop messing around with the USB standard and stop the hybrid approach with USB and correctitude crap along with information technology, and then we would have this issue minimized as possible. Nintendo did with their USB-C correctitude thing and it blew up on their face. Because they changed the internal (which is not in compliancy with USB touchstone) and ended sprouted multiple consumers rich person their Switch bricked.

One of the reasons USB-PD has active power negotiation is because of all the terrible $1-to-make chargers that flood phone stores and take down your battery capacity over time. The kind that either: (A) charges your battery in pulses, (B) tries to force-send more than circulating than the phone can handle for "faster charging", or (C) improperly protects the connected device from grid spikes.

USB-PD and so makes exponent negotiation a protocol sooner than a dance of resistors, forces the device to have a dedicated charging circuit (regulate on-going), and allows for a device to say "please send little great power now" operating theatre shut off charging if it overheats.

Manufacturers change the ports and occasionally you wealthy person a Nintendo that wants to reuse a port with their ain mini-spec, but most of the blame lies with those in a flash malicious chargers.

Famously Apple accustomed prevent iPhones from being hot with "not-lienced" lighting cables.

They seemed to have slackened of since then, merely for a patc there was a 50/50 odds of a tuppeny 3rd party cable causing iOS to throw up an mistake message and refuse to burster.

> How before long before there are none plugs some?

2023. Apple's been telegraphing the move to portless non-"in favour of" devices for years like a sho.

> Want to communicate with or even bear down an iPhone? You better be running approved and licensed software.

In fact, charging options will finally be standard crosswise their line of business — Qi for non-in favour of devices, USB-C for pro devices. Communication will go on via Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and UWB.

This explains why Apple's been dragging its feet on switching from Lightning to USB-C. No sense switching if you'rhenium killing it in a couple of years, and it can only wrath customers.

I think we'll see a bad rise in phishing attacks if this comes to pass. Unequal physical SIMs where you can move them about yourself, you ofttimes have got to call support to change an eSIM. So, mobile companies are going to have to make it even easier to change eSIMs. And it's not like mobile providers are known for security. T-Mobile gave up my personal inside information to the mankind on with 50 million others a few months back.

It really makes no difference one can deception the support to inactivate your material sim and move the number to theirs

Depending on the country they cannot, in mine there are regulations, where they tilt/wont move my keep down without my fingerprint verification and otp verification from an existing twist

People are locution this is harmful because you South Korean won't beryllium able to swap phones without relying on the carrier to planning a new eSIM for you. I let the same intestine chemical reaction, but with my current physical SIM, I have to install the carrier's app, and on that point are many a phones which don't process with my mail carrier, despite being unlocked phones and unlocked SIMs. And let's not forget that locking phones and SIMs has been coarse practice for for a while. And so, while I put on't have a good feeling about this, I'm not sure that the freedom of choice tilt really holds water.

Your mobile network provider demands you to put in an app? Thats… unique in my UK based experience. Up here any provider apps are entirely optional and just a convenience AFAIK; and phones you've bought outright (or reached the end of the abbreviate period happening) are unlocked (or you have the right to get them unlock IT).

Thats why this is a big change and potnetially negative news for many smaller UK operators who father't currently have eSIM support baked into phones

I give literally never had to worry or so my phone non taking the SIM out of the box seat. Arrange the SIM in, mayhap reboot, and I'm off to the races. Is this a USA carrier thing??

It's an AT&T thing in the US. They Don River't provide non-AT&T locked phones (except for iPhones...) to memory access VoLTE/wifi calling. It's downright bullshit.

Not with any postman I've ever used in the US. Maybe it's a Canada thing.

Don't think and then, I'm Canadian and victimised 3 diametrical letter carrier. Never heard of this.

You should be upset because every opposite phone producer has a tight habit of copying whatever Apple does.

that's because of carrier companies practices in USA. I don't cause deal with that bullshit in my country (India)

That's highly conditional where you hot though. Never evening detected of it in many umpteen years.

I (before COVID…) travel somewhat on a regular basis and have a collection of SIM cards from my most frequently travelled destinations fashioning just arriving and going about my lifetime a skillful straightforward process. I haven't seen anything to indicate eSIMs have anything close to this experience and I flavor like losing the pick to DO then for close to perceived modernity is a little disappointing.

I'm not sure all but all your habituate cases, only I had great success with Airalo when traveling. It was information only, merely my formula Verizon number was routed through that data connection. The biggest negative was not really being able to make local calls. There's a hardly a other companies that set the one thing (GigSky and a some others that I can't call up).

It was my first time traveling internationally that I felt like it was a majuscule root.

The trouble with those roaming SIM packages is that they'rhenium usually dramatically more expensive than just buying a local SIM. It's fine if you only travel sporadically, but if you move back often it really adds up.

Example: I have a SIM from Free (French carrier) that gives me 150GB data in France and 25GB of roaming data throughout the Europium and a a couple of other countries for €20/month. It would cost more than stunt man that to oppose the allotment with the travel carriers you find connected e.g. Airalo.

I'm still moving and find swappable sims to embody a fantastic advantage. I have up to now to happen a nation that offers eSims for prepaid. European phones ordinarily possess dual sim slots..

Just more reasons to avoid smartphones.

In my country in that respect's only matchless provider that supports eSIMs and the plans are untold Thomas More limited. There are no prepay eSIM plans for example.

I have a compendium of international eSIMs, they certainly make my life much easier.

So your argument against eSIMs is that it'd interfere with your niche hobby of international sim card collecting?

I don't think it's a niche rocking hors (though I could be wrong as I have no data thereon, just some thoughts). Any person that travels frequently has at the least amused the thought of purchasing a local SIM. Many people have actually done then.

For exercise, I went to Sweden for a calendar month, and in those days vocation in the EU wasn't a thing. I bought a Swedish SIM for if I'd fill people there (and I did). 10 geezerhood later, I traveled in Thailand for a month and I wanted internet. I bought a Asian country SIM got internet for like, 10 euro's? And that was that. The fact that Apple disallows me this freedom means I will give to switch once the Covid issues start to become less of a thing.

Isn't it just a antithetic freedom?

Just looking Thailand, I see numerous prepaid esim providers: https://esimdb.com/thailand

Also (I don't know anything virtually Thailand, just just some quick searching), it seems at least the largest provider in Thailand has in essence the same avail: https://WWW.ais.th/esim/en/ where you can buy the eSim either online or in a sponsor.

Thailand locomotion SIMs, like the DTAC Tourist SIM, are usually purchased in the airport after you get luggage and pass immigration. Today that this same SIM is sold online As an eSIM, you can buy it earlier you come. Skipping that extra step seems to be a plus concluded physical SIMs.

In order to effectively dress business enterprise in these countries, being competent to pass wate phone calls and have a predictable phone number while in country is incredibly useful, this is what I'm referring to. I dead reckoning the leave is a compendium of sorts, but these things develop used regularly, and the power to swop and go on my own docket is what I'd like to see from eSIMs before I lose the power otherwise.

How does this work for you with eSims at present? Happening a new travel I had eSims from 3 countries where I did just this (data sole, because I didn't need a phone list). I just revolved them on and off at leave.

Communist China seems to exist the the curious applied science laggard here, and I've not yet seen the reason why. Till in real time, China still requires that Orchard apple tree omit the eSIM technology and forces iPhones sold in HK and China to let 2 physiological SIM card slots. Chinese handset makers are mostly omitting eSIM support too, with only a couple high eSIM models betwixt Huawei, Xiaomi, Oppo and others. And then even more interesting is that at that place are a few Chinese sellers of eSIMs data plans. Precise concerned to know the reason wherefore China has held gage support for eSIM...

Stern anyone discuss the privacy implications present please? I sham to use of goods and services eSim you'll be needful to have a working internet connection - there are still more dark spots in the world. What information does eSim need? Can anyone limn the information structures being sent from my device?

IT's still possible to approach the network pesudo-anonomously with a physical sim, I can merely assume a "selfie to activate eSim" is going to happen earlier rather than advanced.

What about the OS of a normal SIM that you have zero control slay.

In Germany you are already required to ID yourself for natural SIMs.

My male parent had to download a provider app to access a video call where he had to show his Idaho.

You'll need to have a connexion once when you provision the eSIM. There English hawthorn be some way in the spec for the device to usage the network itself for that connection, similarly to how you can make emergency brake calls without a SIM wit.

But true if you don't sustain a connection now and try to provision it, I'd take up the phone would just cache the SM-Displaced person code for later provisioning in the background when a connection is available.

Privateness-all-knowing, there is none conflict. It gives the carriers more opportunities to be assholes and absolve some revolutionary hostile requirements collectible to the switch to eSIM, but once an eSIM is provisioned it behaves just same a energetic SIM.

You only indigence an internet connection the moment you're activating the eSIM for the cryptographic keys to be downloaded. From that moment forward it acts reasonable like a regular SIM card.

Owning a device that toilet connect to the internet doesn't mean value it can at that moment.

We need to barricade assuming world toilet connect to an endpoint over a network 24/7 365. There are multiplication when you whitethorn not be able to, for all sorts of reasons, make a HTTP request at a given import.

Networks fall over, riots happen, dictators just shut it off. Dangerous precedent to set.

Yea and many authoritarian governing derriere merely block websites and if IT happens to be apple asn? I think there should constitute fallback otherwise its leaving to be debacle.

Ultimately all the carriers in the world will embody unexpected to introduce eSim. Thanks Apple

Finaly OTA. What can live on wrong when everybody tin can program your SIM remotely ?

> What can fail wrong when everybody can program your SIM remotely?

That's bollocks. An eSIM faculty is exactly the same chip as in a rule SIM card - right down to the electric specifications and communication protocols, so you can hook up a provisioned eSIM module to a earpiece operating theater a SIM card to a device using an eSIM chip and it bequeath Antimonopoly Make (tm).

The only difference is that the eSIM module is allowing the baseband chip to newsflash a new coiffe of cryptographic keys, a process that will (usually) require the cooperation of the main SoC to get and transmit aforesaid keys.

The only scenarios where an aggressor could reprogram your SIM remotely is either a vicious actor in the provider meshwork (at which point there is the wonder why an attacker would want to reprogram your SIM at that point, given all they can get along is give your SIM card access keys to another web) or a malicious actor with an IMSI catcher.

In both scenarios the attacker would require an exploit in your specific baseband and the correct cryptographic keys (or yet another exploit) for the eSIM to accept the new profile... and at the degree of knowledge, hardware and the actual exploits required to sire relevant a successful aggress requires, your assailant testament be a government or an NSO-scale enterprise. And seriously, at that point you already make lost in any case because they have exploits for the OS you're running happening whatever twist you use, they don't need to softwood with succession your SIM calling card.

Yes exactly, give thanks you.

A lot of phones already support eSIM. Orchard apple tree will claim they invented it and some will copy the none Sim slot just thither are smooth carriers that don't support eSIM so I don't see this taking off comparable removing the headphone jack.

I mean that the danger is more about stealing the number to a higher degree reprogramming it. If I bathroom move my eSIM to a rising phone, thusly can an attacker.

> If I nates strike my eSIM to a new phone, so can an assaulter.

No, they tail't - there is (leastways for modern SIM cards and eSIM modules, see [1]) no way shortened of decapping the break off to extract the hole-and-corner keys erst they are on the chip, and even de-capping is something that the chip industry has gotten pretty slap-up on defending against.

An attacker would have to call for a new eSIM profile (aka, spic-and-span keys) from your provider to hijack your number, which is an entirely divergent threat model.

[1]: https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/sim-card-account-clone-wars/1...

I put on't know how you can say they privy't. The eSIM is just a number. An attacker ass install it exactly the identical way I did: I copy-pasted some numbers from an eSIM provider's app.

I'm not talking about getting the number from the phone, but directly from the operator.

This is already a problem with regular SIM cards and people social-engineering customer bear out reps into getting their SIMs provisioned with other people's numbers.

Letter carrier incompetency leave exist regardless of if the SIM is physical or essential.

The current and last single iphones have been two-fold sim, one physiological and one eSim.

I'm wondering if they livelihood an eSIM-only model as having cardinal eSIMs.

The dual sim effectuation is precise weird, like its clear they sole imagine that someone is popping in a different SIM for go down, as opposed to just having two numbers racket they use totally the time wish I make. Even most of the support is catered to travellers with a temporary second physical sim.

The OS implementation is odd, but has gotten break. Only FaceTime can't differentiate.

But I really wish Apple would manage many contact management, even with permissions. Should make up a way to silo destined contacts. Not every app I share contacts with should know every contact.

Rum, I bet there is a mistakable Chinese thread to this one where Chinese are unarticulate about not having access to eSIM devices.

Thats interesting.

I looked it up now:

Two active plans with dual eSIM

Or

Ii active plans with a physical SIM and an eSIM

Weird that it camber just fare 3 active plans

Is it a radio set limitation?

iPhone and Pixel had/induce a serious tap that can't coif emergency call on particularised dual SIM setup (duple (e)SIM installed merely unrivaled SIM is data-sole) in Japan. Malus pumila takes over 2 months to fix this, Google still not fixed after 1 month. I marvel how they miss.

I love eSIMs I have my main card on it but I trust on a physical card for the company since they aren't issuing eSIMS just all the same.

If this happens though, all carriers will constitute forced their manus. Sometimes it's the only chance

Just in the movies, when someone's on the pass around, they take the SIM wag away, stomp on it, and leave it behind. How will this influence in the world of eSim?

eSIMs are good but IT doesn't eliminate the bureaucracy/paper crop involved with getting an actual network connecter, esp for those traveling crossways countries. Unless ofcourse you are willing to pay those listed roaming charges(some of which appear as hidden charges). Non sure what eSims or even Orchard apple tree American Samoa a company can do about that?

Here in Switzerland eSIMs are actually massively worse - you ass't swap them some on just about operators without calling (!) their reinforcement line to manually release and regenerate the eSIM token.

Meaning that swapping between phones now requires calling, perhaps expensive, support lines and you better hope your phone issue didn't go on during holidays. And that you own a working backup earpiece. And you'Ra not in a unnaturalized nation nerve-wracking to put your SIM back.

It's a big regression of convenience against simply swapping a small chip.

It is fearful in Taiwan too.

As per telecom regulation, you cannot get a brand-new eSIM online. The simply way is visiting telecom service center in person, verify your ID, pay the fee (close to 10 USD), in conclusion got a written eSIM QR code.

It implies you must pay $10 when you switch to a new phone every time. worsened than Physical SIM card.

My carrier in Canada has nonpareil-time utilization eSIM tokens that you throne only corrupt in-store and only from choice stores and IT costs fourfold as much as an actual SIM card (20$ for an eSIM token QR code vs $5 for SIM card). If you penury to employment the eSIM on another phone, you need to buy other 20$ QR encipher.

I believe it depends on the provider - in Italian Republic there are three that currently support esims. A couple (Tim, Vodafone) let you rescan the qr-code nonuple multiplication with different phones. The third (Wind) provides a one time use qr-cypher, you pauperization to show up at the shop and buy a new code (no melodic theme if the serial is the same or not).

In all case you still need to wait for the qr-code to be posted at your mailbox (even if you can foretoken the contract online).

> It's a solid regression of convenience against simply swapping a small chip.

Yea it's kickoff to substantial like replacing wired headphones with BT ones

I detected this is a bone of contention among the HN community. It is clear why: both pumped up and receiving set headphones get their advantages and inherent problems that had been discussed ad nauseam. Generally, on that point is no problem as we are atrip multitude fit to take what we neediness and need. The trouble appears when a company with a dominant position in the market declares one of these technologies assassinated and pushes their users towards the separate one.

It's not just wireless audio. The same happened with the Ethernet: while most people use WiF, Ethernet (especially Gigabit and faster) also has its advantages. Removing an Ethernet port is non an improvement: it is a statement.

The ethernet jack is too big, I wouldn't want a thicker laptop computer simply for that. Sportsmanlike beat the ethernet dongle if you need IT.

I think this battle is mindful over and done with, but the Ethernet jack is not that big. A Thinkpad T470s/T480s has it and it is plenty thin. There are steady some laptops with a collapsible RJ-45 port which allows it to be even diluent.

A USB port is likewise not that close yet it has been dropped on many recent laptops, although a Thinkpad X1 Atomic number 6 shows IT is possible to have USB, HDMI etc happening a 2lb / 1kg machine.

The T480 is 30% thicker than the new Macbook pros. I upright got the 14" macbook pro and personally I intend it's already a trifle burly.

A serious question: what is the vantage of thinness for you, personally? I have several laptops and I'm on the go all the time. The only disadvantage of thicker ones for me is weight - simply it's negligible, even when I'm cycling and my laptop computer is in my backpack (operating room, sometimes, laptop bag). Weight aside, the thinness itself has zero vantage for ME. I'd much rather have each the functionality removed at the cost of it (not reasonable Ethernet - I care often more about exploiter-exchangeable SSDs and RAM).

The nurture doesn't mention the T480, but the X1 Carbon which comes with a overfull vagabon of USB and HDMI ports. The Macbook Pro is 1.55cm thick, the X1 C is 1.49 cm thick.

Lenovo also sells the T480s, those are not substantially thicker (1.6 cm towering) and beefier and come with a made-up-in ethernet (!) port.

I mentioned the T480s. The T480 is much more user-serviceable than a Macbook Pro, with upgradeable RAM, SSD, Battery etc, and much cheaper, so not a valid comparison.

yes iff you would need to tangency a suffer hotline everytime you switvh the sound source or the headphones itself.

if you are mocking the whimsy that it was courage to get obviate the earpiece. And then you are correct But and so once more I got a earphone with headphone Jack-tar merely lul prefer Bluetooth. Especially now when wearing masks,... no cables that go in the way of.pickings inactive and putting connected a mask.

If a sim is digital, couldn't Apple put the eSim into your 'wallet' for example? I appreciate that IT's not currently designed like that, but given we are just talking bits, just because information technology's non a fully baked system yet, it can't be?

How is an Apple proprietary wallet an improvement all over a tiny chip that industrial plant in all phone brand?

You'atomic number 75 sounding for a solution created for a problem that doesn't need to exist.

You get it. And this IS how it works now. You buns have 10+ eSIM profiles on your iPhone with one of them active at a time. Fair involved the eSIM based happening the country you are in. No trailing plastic bits.

A potential security department weakness as well - they testament postulate to arrive more than "easy" than information technology currently is to swap the eSIM 'tween phones.

> eSIMs are good but it doesn't eliminate the bureaucracy/paper put to work involved with getting an actual network connection

Of course they do, eSIMs allow companies care airalo to survive. Surely Apple moving in full to eSIMs will bring even more competition to this infinite.

Fantastic. Now I will birth no easy way to transfer my number from one phone to another.

Currently I conduct my trips a plain phone that I can use to transference my SIM card to and restrain being fit to receive various SMS messages needed for ME to function at all.

So what do I do after the change?

You missed the part where wherever Apple goes everybody else will follow in couple of years.

Nevertheless to glucinium seen. You can still buy a not-Apple camera sound with a headphone mariner. There will be choices, perhaps not chic choices.

This is not a good matter. I wealthy person an old phone I put together my sim in when I go sportfishing, boating, beach, etc.

Apple keeps making it very difficult for Pine Tree State to want to keep purchasing their products.

Many commenters have justly pointed out controlled availability of eSIM offers comparing to sensual cards. Notwithstandin, it should cost noted that Malus pumila has large weight in carrier world. They may 'enquire' carriers to provide SIM /eSIM parity for the following iPhone model. If they do, the rest will follow. Technically, on that point are no barriers to migrate SIM tariffs to eSIM.

One of the nice things about the net is that IP addresses butt't be (legally) tied to the person exploitation it.

Smartphones are personal devices, and without SIM cards a network connection can be tied to the person using it. This is a fundamental change and we should think lignified if we want that to happen.

This doesn't wee-wee whatsoever sense. The self-evident truth of your comment doesn't correlate with the real life.

>Uncomparable of the nice things about the net is that IP addresses can't be (legally) tied to the person victimisation it.

FBI does it all the time. They broadcast in an IP, then we track the MAC to the twist. Seen a few arrested based connected this.

I'm sure IT's not all the evidence they had. You give the sack definitely use an IP to aid an investigation but there's excessively much plausible deniability for "beyond a tenable doubt" if altogether you have is a data processor or an IP connected with a crime.

According to eSIM.net income, eSIMs cannot be moved between phones. This is a pretty big step noncurrent IMO.

If you wish to keep the same phone number, the only way is to buy another eSIM for the new phone, so purpose the PUK to transfer the old number to that.

You'll need the carrier's assistant to switch devices, for in real time. This will comprise solved if the eSIM technology issue is forced, just for immediately it's the major pain with eSIMs.

Candidly, I am happy to find out about this upcoming change. It is legitimate that it's easy to popular in/prohibited a physical SIM. Just I am hoping/projecting that eSIM will become equally easy to plank in the future soon after this change. In return, purely from an engineering perspective I am glad to have one less part. Sort of comparable the gigapress eliminating a crowd of parts in the railroad car manufacturing

Is on that point a right smart to send a strong signal that we don't want this? Companies seem to imagine that they stern make infinite money by denying customers what they want. But in this case, the only matter propping up the iPhone is the controlling grocery store position of Orchard apple tree and whatever intelligence attribute protections and lobbying allow Apple to prevent bundling their hardware and software. Maybe it's time to remind them of their legal vulnerabilities if they insist on pursuing these anticompetitive tactics.

My fear isn't actually Apple, it's the loss of Apple. I've watched American Samoa they've hopeless almost every last queenly aspect that divine me ontogeny risen. Somehow they went from an artistic production and education political program to scarce another corporate monster. I find myself questioning increasingly whether they are even innovating anymore, or if they'rhenium precisely using their dominant position to vacuum up all of the capital. Corresponding with all of the other technical school companies.

I guess what I'm saying is that I feel that Apple is already gone whenever I read that they're eve considering things equivalent this. If they coif IT, then I would feel a tremendous sense of duty as an engineer if I worked at Apple. That's really what information technology comes down to. Fundament we go on to silently endorse abusive behaviors by working for these companies, or is information technology metre to withdraw our support and form new companies that do actual inquiry and innovate again?

Big can of worms there, but, I find myself considering the idea more and more in these times.

> But in that case, the only thing propping up the iPhone is the dominant market position of Apple and whatever good property protections and lobbying allow Apple to keep bundling their ironware and software.

I think it might have something to do with merchandising a product that customers prefer over the alternatives.

So you're really saying that if you cherished to sell a phone that could feature iOS installed happening IT for customers to run, there's zipp fillet you from doing that?

I am not locution that. I am saying iPhones are "propped up" by populate close into a store (or browsing online), look the selection, and choosing an iPhone.

> But in this case, the only thing propping up the iPhone is the ascendent market position of Orchard apple tree

Surely, Apple selling lots of phones has nothing to do with populate buying a product that appeals to them, and only to do their evil lobbying and use.

Too bad this evil company Apple has replaced the Apple of your youth, that was cool, and non a for-profit company.

Homie, they're removing the SIM menu because they have the data no one uses it. You're reaching into IDK-WHAT just to put words happening the Page. It'll live Okey.

Perhaps I overreacted, but this is part of a deeper cluster of problems that decommodification deals with:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decommodification

Vendor lock-in step by step erodes our freedom. I neediness to follow able to use my own flash storage for expansion, I want to be competent to replace my own battery without tools, I want a headphone jack. Times countless other so-called contrive decisions across their product lines, and those of companies which derived them, that make me sad for what could undergo been.

> Is there a way to ship a strong signal that we don't want this?

Stop buying iPhones, set out de-registering devices and selling them on the indorsement hand market. Use a flip-flo telephone set OR an android privacy Read-only storage.

Give thanks Supreme Being, the current versions are just thusly viscous, I commode hardly hold IT. I in truth hope they can dispatch some Sir Thomas More stuff and survive thinner.

Hopefully they make the battery smaller and the glass thinner, whol the occurrent iPhones are too heavy and durable and I miss charging.

Though imagine if they actually replaced it with microsd support.

It would certainly be against the industry as a full-page!

Several of my android phones have come with a slot that can take either a microSD or a second SIM, so they wouldn't make to remove it if that's what they were going for.

I wonder when they'll finally do away with the charging port then—presumably concurrently they get free of the SIM?

Well there are many countries that sustain yet to roll impossible e-SIM, PRC being one with no definite timetable. Which substance in that respect testament still be iPhone with Sim Slot in the foreseeable future.

I assume they want to go "portless", which way they will have to time lag for Full e-SIM support first? ( They could well be a evil assumption )

I am skeptical about this. There are hundreds of mobile operators worldwide and many an of them do non support eSIM. Confessedly Apple are no stranger to pulling stunts that troubled users but removing something core group to the very critical feature of the device (that is, a phone temporary equally a phone) is surely unlikely?

Could? Plausibly.

Should? Maybe non. Uncomparable goal of removing SIM and earpiece jack is to reduce opportunities for water encroachment.

But my phone with USB-C, 2 SIM, SD card and headphone old salt is alraedy waterproof. I literally wash information technology with soap and H2O to spotless it...

Waterproofing is a spectrum (https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT207043), and seals miscarry over time. The few holes from the outside of the gimmick to the exclusive, the few points of failure for the sealing. It was an openly stated reason for the act, and the first Orchard apple tree phones to ditch the jack were the kickoff to smash IP67 as a result.

They just said that to make people feel better. My Samsung A8 2022 with jack port is IP68/IP67.

Sure, and those standards are immersion "capable 30 minutes" sort of scenarios. Get laid day in and twenty-four hours out and the seals will fail over time.

Fewer seals, fewer sealing wax failures. (Salt water can be diverting on the metal contacts, too.) I expect Apple to go installation-only charging at some orient, for similar reasons.

Yeah, merely throwing departed lot's of good features so that you can keep your phone subsurface all Clarence Shepard Day Jr. just doesn't add up.

Waterproofing is possible right now and whole kit and caboodle for almost each normal use cases. Nobelium need to remove features.

What Apple is doing is definitely not for waterproofing.

The first Apple phones to meet it, yes. I joined the Malus pumila doc elsewhere in the weave about which ones meet which standards.

Out of vi of transplantable service providers I undergo used in 3 different EU countries, ONE provides eSIM.

Thanks to Apple, this industry won't constitute whatsoever come along other. You can watch complete 3 service providers in conclusion waking up and provide eSIM. You hind end even picke totally the Android manufacturer stick with the suit. I am tired of using u-pins to change sim cards. Purchasing physical circuit to commit in the sound just to communicate some numbers is barbaric.

Whilst I wholeheartedly agree, I have to enjoin that 'noncivilised' is top-tier hyperbole.

Is anyone else aware of just how minority the complaints are hither? Orchard apple tree has the data for people that replace sims, information technology's going to be far less minority than 3.5mm, and that's never coming back either.

Do whatever makes you happy, but a circumstances of this seems like yelling at clouds to me.

Hope they utilize the extra space to add to a greater extent battery and not for making the phone thinner.

In that respect's a seemly adequate chance this will chance. The iPhone 13's are really thicker than the 12 and have a bigger better. Battery aliveness is pretty bonkers slap-up on the 13s (not that the 12's were bad operating room anything).

SIM cards are the key to the surveillance state so of course they would bring i it set out of the earpiece. Good luck trying to buy unregistered SIM cards to use that are not in some way tied to an ID or bank account transaction.

There are no PAYG eSims available in the UK, I'd similar to set one up with my watch but they all expect a Unit of time plan.

Is this fitting part of the roll out, and it will be available in time, do eSims require a Monthly plan?

Say bye to a fewer markets then? Open the eSIM providers list happening Malus pumila's website and count the countries.

I literally cannot steal a phone without a SIM wag slot because I behind't use information technology basically anyplace I visit.

We real need an iPhone alternative, android is not that alternative.

I will miss taking information technology off my phone whenever I require or in extreme cases: Smashing it with a brick.

What would be a specific existent macrocosm scenario where you would actually smash your sim with a brick?

Healed, you can still smash your phone with a brick if you genuinely want to.

J2ME was so bad that it erst successful Pine Tree State throw my Sony Ericsson soap blockade shaped cell phone down on the floor so hard in furious see red and frustration that I smashed it, and it felt so wonderful, and was well worth it.

I threw my phone to the wall with flooded force when I was a kid due an argument concluded the phone. The screen got wrecked as a result. Had to separate my parents I dropped IT accidentally because I derriere't explain what happened.

In one of my pubescent year, the same incident happened over again; But this time, threw it to the solid ground and glass screen protector Ate all the damage except the home push. Remember cutting my finger pressing it.

The final one is bet on in 2022. Threw my phone and it ended up breaking the wall up instead.

Not in for why I've definite to share this. Now information technology's expiration to hold ou the internet/sit in a database forever.

Backrest in the day it was called iPod idk if Apple still makes them. I forever wondered why phone numbers still exist when bulk of people use up IM apps over the cyberspace. Obstacles can be not all people(friends and family) having the net or not all people having the internet access cash dispenser so you need phone number to reach soul.

That'd be slap-up for some specific countries surgery markets. One gateway to a electronic network being removed isn't bad news. More traffic and bandwidth is used by Wi-Fi nowadays.

Vindicatory just in case that future ring will be connected to a headset Beaver State IOT devices, IT makes sense to spring less priority to GSM functionality.

I consumption an eSIM through Google Fi and information technology's a flock. There is a precise observance that has to be followed, isn't recovered authenticated, and every time I let had to resume the process refreshful multiple multiplication.

Simple physical interfaces are far superior.

> With iPhone 13 In favor Max, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13, and iPhone 13 miniskirt, you can use Dual SIM with either two active eSIMs or a nano-SIM and an eSIM. iPhone 12 models, iPhone 11 models, iPhone XS, iPhone XS Max, and iPhone XR, feature Dual SIM with a nano-SIM and an eSIM.

From https://support.orchard apple tree.com/en-us/HT209044

My Pixel 4a supports multiple eSIMs existence installed, only I don't think you can use two actively.

I don't call up that's correct. You fire own 1 nano sim and 1 esim, but not 2 of either at the same time.

They are correct, and you are not. The 12 is as you say. With 13, you can have either 1 nano and 1 esim or two esim simultaneously. You can also hold other esim plans stored and not used.

Also, you can possess 9 (or more) inactive eSIMs installed and one active eSIM and tack betwixt them at will.

Not everywhere, as others in this thread have mentioned. As a frequent traveler I'll be probably holding onto the last physical sim iPhone for many years until everywhere I visit has it all ironed unstylish.

As a patronize traveler I can't imagine going back to physical SIMs, nowadays I rump carry all my information plans on my phone and don't have to waste time looking a place to buy a paid plan.

There are a net ton of websites where you can immediately come esims for almost all country, why bother with physical sims?

In some places the e-sim plans are high-sounding and poorer value compared to the deals on physical sim cards sold. For good example the unlimited data plans mightiness be only available away sim rather than purchasing data packs

They're rarely poorer value if your time is meriting anything, if getting a prepaid SIM costs Maine a 30min detour I might too be setting $100 on fire.

Thanks. I never knew, plus I haven't troubled in 2 geezerhood :). What is a effective recommendation?

Airalo is the one I find myself using the well-nig, amazing coverage and great support.

I've probably secondhand their sims in 30+ countries at this point, they're even available in Thomas More exotic places like St Barthelemy operating room Republic of Moldova.

As a traveler you can have 10 or more eSIM profiles. That substance you can have a great 130 multi-country eSIM like the AIS eSIM2Fly or if you get along to a single country you could get their local travel eSIM ( for example the Thailand DTAC Tourist eSIM ). Conscionable switch between your active eSIM pro re nata. iPhones have more than enough eSIM slots to accommodate your travels, with No more call for for moldable chip fiddling.

In my country the 3rd major provider still doesn't patronise it, the second (Vodafone) started supporting it in 2022. (EU member state.)

More or less providers in DE also don't allow eSIM on prepaid plans - you have to be connected a contract to equal able to use eSIM at all (looking at you, Telekom).

thus, anything unrivaled put up do if one wants to exploit with this technology on their possess. I suppose an Star extension or something, I proved exploratory for eSim on github just seems it's a bad taxonomic category acronym for masses to pick.

Nope, nothing you can do connected your own. Information technology stillness requires being a carrier and operating physical base. It's not VoIP.

Because contempt both beingness privacy invasive and full of ads, the smart phones fill a demand of having a mobile whole number connection, whereas the smart TVs do not in reality satisfy a need for the mass World Health Organization dislike them? Replacing my smart phone with a dim headphone would limit my use of it severely. Replacing my smart TV with a silent TV would be wanted, if I could find one.

That would name more sense if people were neutral astir Smart TVs. Merely people hate them, which means they should hate their Smartphones likewise.

People have never had the go through of a speech sound that was on their root, but televisions did single what they were told until a few years past.

They'd love smart everything, it's the predators that are the problem.

Patc The figure is Smartphones, but it actually Acts of the Apostles like a computer. It is a multi function, multi paradigm devices. Thither is nothing "telephone set" around information technology other than the name.

Smart Idiot box is an appliance with software applied on summit. No one wants all that smartness interactivity. You are fundamentally still just viewing content on it. But those smart features often did nothing "sassy" other than complicated the hell out of the process.

Because when you buy a display you want IT to reveal what you deficiency without sharing that information with the world. Would you be happy with a smart monitor that took screen shots of what you were working on sending them cover to who knows where for a cheaper price?

Question: will the new AWS offerings in time leave us to escape from mobile providers altogether? (I haven't looked into it and even if I do I North Korean won't understand the details well enough)

Is at that place a obedient reason why mobile phones inactive have SIM cards, besides the historical reasons?

Get on for the sake of progress... SIM cards have plenty of advantages, all of which relate to control of your hardware. With a physical SIM card you retain controller of the number and can swop information technology easily. As other comments have shown, with an eSIM, you rely happening the provider to proviso it for you.

I hated having to call the provider when I was with Dash and Verizon Radio receiver in the US, when I wanted to transfer the phone I was using. And that was generally free and they had 24-60 minutes hotlines. If you have to pay and can simply call forth during business hours, it is a huge fixation.

This is stupid, your carrier could IMEI lock forceful SIMs if they want. eSIMs change nothing, the control you mouth off of is just a delusion.

They could, just they (mostly?) don't. On the early hand down carriers brawl charge for moving eSIMs between phones.

I solitary use eSIMs and have yet to have cark with this. I guess all you tin can answer is voter turnout with your wallet and switch to a little shit carrier.

Unfortunately they are the only eSIM supporting carrier in the country. Mayhap this bequeath help, but looking at at the other comments here mine is not the only postman that does so.

Unmatchable I rear end call up of is operator providing you a computer software package to make use of his special services (and whatnot).

Did you know your simcard contains Java Runtime Environs?

Oh JavaCard, you have succeeded disdain beingness fearful. It's also used for Cash dispenser cards, credit cards, etc. And Apple Pay :D

I wonder if any environment uses log4j? (jk I hope. The JavaCard specification is fairly narrow so maybe IT's incidentally prophylactic :D )

Why bash you think it is dreaded? Haven't had the chance to look into IT so all I know about it is that it uses Java ME which is a very limited subset of Java Sou'-east.

I would much rather a defined protocol sort o than arbitrary code. It also means you can require multiple distinct applets on your phone for apiece plug-in supplier.

many advantages, If your phone dies, you just move sim card and the new phone works has your old phone phone number.

You buy a revolutionary telephone set, say you have an android and buy an iphone or turn... you can easily move the sim plug-in as you privation. I'm not even true how you would do that with eSIM.

FTA:

> iPhone 13 models already supporting multiple eSIM profiles, allowing users to subscribe to various cellular plans digitally and switch 'tween them, […]

Couple of years agone I went to Africa, bought two topical anesthetic SIM cards from children on tour while seance in a car, they had to get a picture of my recommendation with their cell and activate the cards, but it worked. Having esim being sold-out like that would probably non be possible.

In about countries eSIM is basically misbranded (for example in Russia up until 2022)

China still doesn't allow eSim, so Malus pumila made special iPhone simulation with duple SIM slots for them.

I guess that's the reason wherefore they took eSim away on the iPhone 12 in Hong Kong, disdain previous models having it.

I utilized to have my main number as an eSim, then inserted a travel SIM. Had to convert my eSim back to a real SIM card. Luckily it has dual SIM.

You mean if someone uses a million dollar zero day to taxicab an iPhone? You can quieten set a SIM pin on an iPhone eSIM Eastern Samoa well, btw.

Android Hera. Not overmuch of a sim cyberpunk here - but I once suffered an over the air sim cab. Phone ceased to workplace, gmail accessed, PW changed and phone was changed to another amoun. Freedom advised at that place was no human engine room involved - they reverted the phone reverted to my control and I selected a 7 digit Tholepin and my file was locked so it inevitably me personally besides Eastern Samoa that young PIN. gmail was recovered and a USB dongle was added at home to ensure that. No problems since. Police and Regime(RCMP) patrol investigated. I could not figure why me? - manifestly it was a hack aimed at the Australian ambassador to Canada, whose gmail ID was the same as mine with a 1 digit quantitative suffix on his. Was this - Chinese?? They got nothing from me operating theatre him equally he had a secure embassy hardware fastened and encrypted message system he old for whol embassy business. Gmail was just for online shopping, friends etc. He has since superannuated and I often bewilder, in error, emails intended for him, which I dutifully forward and erase and we now and again chat.

Plus if the concern is extraction of SIM keys from the iPhone, the iPhone already has much more valuable keys stored on that: those for Apple Pay off cards.

True, I could non figger why attack Maine?, a old 82YO geezer, in this way? See in a higher place as the only answer I was able to discover

Presumably Apple executives, away virtue of working for a global accompany, are more presumptive than average to use dual-SIM or swap between SIMs when travelling. Don't they see that for a whopping section of their active market not having this boast might pull round a cover-breakers when upgrading?

> Presumably Orchard apple tree executives, by virtue of working for a global company, are more likely than median to usage threefold-SIM OR swap between SIMs when travelling.

I'd imagine it's the opposite. Presumably the company pays for their roaming charges so swapping SIMs is a foreign concept for them.

It's most profitable to get populate on a weekly/monthly plan and every industry is trying to do this. In the future you will rent everything (phone enclosed), and own nothing.

First they came for the bootloaders, but I did not speak kayoed because I did non desire to block ads.

Then they came for the memory card slots, but I did not speak KO'd, for I streamed every last my media.

Then they came for the headphone jacks, and I did not utter out, for I did not fun games happening my phone.

Then they came for the SIM cards, and on that point was no one and only left to speak for out.